Due
to two main features of the double bond, electrophilic addition reactions occur:
In
a carbon–carbon double bond, there's a cloud of Ï€ electrons above and below the
atoms' plane. Unlike the tightly held σ electrons that connect the carbon
atoms, these π electrons are more loosely held. This makes them readily
available to a reagent in search of electrons. Consequently, the carbon–carbon
double bond often acts as a source of electrons, behaving like a nucleophile.
The
molecules or ions it reacts with are electron-deficient and can accept an
electron pair, known as electrophiles. The reaction begins with the addition of
an electrophile to one of the sp2 hybridized carbons in the alkene,
followed by the addition of a nucleophile to the other sp2
hybridized carbon. This process breaks the π bond, and the two sp2
carbons form two new bonds with the reagent.
In
an addition reaction, one π bond and one σ bond transform into two σ bonds. The
energy released during the formation of two π bonds surpasses the energy needed
to break one σ bond and one π bond. Therefore, addition reactions are typically
exothermic and energetically favourable.
Electrophilic
reaction to the C-C double bond is the most common type of reaction which this
function undergoes. Electrophilic addition to a C=C usually occurs in two
steps:
Step
1: The incoming electrophile with its vacant orbital attacks the π cloud in a
perpendicular direction from above or below the plane to form a π-complex which
may or may not be an intermediate. The π-complex then may change to a carbenium
ion through formation of a σ bond between an atom of the electrophile and any
one of the double bonded Cs.
If
the electrophile possesses a lone pair of non-bonded electrons, then a three
member cyclic cation results in which the electrophile forms two σ bonds with
two C atoms of the C=C and bears an intermediate of a true cyclic product.
However the Cyclic intermediate cation has, to some extent, a carbenium ion
–like character. This step is the slow step and hence is the rate determining
step.
Step
2: In this step the rate the carbenium ion or the three membered cyclic cation,
combines with a nucleophile to produce the addition product. It is the fast
step.
Since
the step 1, the electrophilic addition to C-C double bond is the slow step and
the transition state (TS) of the state involves both the substrate and the reagent,
the electrophile, the reaction is expected to follow the second order kinetics.
The
rate = k[Substrate][reagent]
Let
us now discuss the problem of constitutional orientation of the electrophilic
addition to the C=C; by constitutional orientation here we mean ascertaining
which one of the two double bonded carbons ultimately forms bond with the
electrophile and which one combines with the nucleophile. The problem of
constitutional orientation does not arise in the arise in the cases of addition
of symmetrical reagents to both symmetrical and unsymmetrical substrates and
also the addition of unsymmetrical reagents to the symmetrical substrates; but
this is very important for the addition of an unsymmetrical C=C (that contains
different groups on two double –bonded carbons; e.g., RCH=CHR1). In most of the
cases the problem may be solved by applying the Markownikoff’s rule.
For
electrophilic additions to unsymmetrical C-C multiple bonds the Markownikoff’s
rule states that the positive part of the unsymmetrical addendum attaches
itself to the multiple bonded carbon atom which has more hydrogen atoms. This
means that the negative part goes to that multiple bonded carbon atom which
bears less hydrogen atom. According to this rule, when HBr is added to propene
in the absence of air, 2-bromopropane is the product and not 1-bromopropane.
Here
The
addition has taken place according to the rule; H+ has attached
itself to the carbon atom with higher hydrogen and Br- to the carbon with
lesser hydrogen. The most acceptable explanation for the Markownikoff rule is
electrophile (E+) adds to that carbon atom which gives the most
stable carbenium ion. The stability of the carbenium ion is determined by
considering +I effect, conjugative effect and hyperconjugative effect as usual.
The order of stability of carbenium ions is:
PhCH2+ ≈
CH2=CH-CH2+ > (CH3)3C+
> (CH3)2CH+ > CH3CH2+
> CH3+
Thus
when H+ adds to carbon with lesser hydrogen of a propene, it
develops n-propyl cation (1o); whereas if it adds to carbon with
higher hydrogen; it gives rise to isopropyl cation (2o). The
isopropyl cation being more stable, a 2o carbenium ion, results by
the attack of H+ on carbon with higher hydrogen.
Stereochemistry:
The steroechemistry of addition is often important in delineating the mechanism
of a reaction. Because the carbon atoms of a double bond are both trigonal
planar (sp2), the elements E and Nu can be added to them from the same side or
from opposite sides.
Triple
bonds are less susceptible to electrophilic attack than double bonds In
general, the triple bonds are less susceptible to electrophilic attack than
double bonds, even though the concentration of electrons in a triple bond is
higher than that in a double bond. The reasons are as follows:
1.
Because of smaller distance between the two triple bonded carbon atoms and
better p orbital overlap, the electrons in the triple bond are held more
tightly and hence, they are poorly available to an electrophile, i.e., it is
harder for an attacking electrophile to pull out a pair. There is evidence from
far-UV spectra to support this conclusion.
2.
An electrophile adds to a double bond to give a saturated carbocation. A
similar addition to a triple bond gives a vinylic cation. A vinylic cation is
less stable than the corresponding saturated carbocation because it possesses
the linear (sp) arrangement instead of planar (sp2) arrangement which, as
suggested by quantum machanics, is the stabler configuration of carbocation.
3.
If the reaction takes places via a bridged-ion intermediate, then those
obtained from triple bond (I) will be highly strained and hence, less stable
than those obtained from double bonds (II). Furthermore, the cyclic ions from
alkynes are antiaromatic and hence, less stable but those from alkenes are not.
However,
it is to be noted that catalytic hydrogenation is an exception to the
generalization that alkenes are more reactive than alkynes towards addition
reactions.
However,
the Markownikoff’s rule does not hold good for all electrophilic addition
reactions to multiple bonds. For example, the addition of HI to allyl chloride
follows the rule and forms 1-chloro-2-iodo-propane; but the addition of HOCl to
the same substrate gives 2, 3-dichloropropane-1-ol instead of 1,
3-dicloropropane-2-ol. This is contrary to the Markownikoff’s rule.
Exceptions of
Markownikoff ’s rule:
Due to special structural features of alkenes addition often takes place not
according to the Markownikoff ’s rule.
When
H+ adds to CH2 == CH –– CF3, one of the carbocations that could be
formed is primary (I) and the other is secondary (II). In the carbocation II, the
powerful electron-attracting – CF3 group is directly attached to the
positive carbon and so, it destabilizes the carbocation by intensifying the
positive charge more than I in which the – CF3 group is not directly
attached to the positive carbon. As a result, the reaction proceeds through the
relatively more stable carbocation I, although a primary one, to give the
anti-Markownikoff product ClCH2CH2CF3. Since a
primary carbocation is too unstable to be formed, the anti-Markownikoff product
is probably obtained through a concerted addition process. Addition of H+
to the doubly bonded carbons of the ammonium salt may produce a primary carbocation
(III) and a secondary carbocation (IV). Because of repulsive destabilization,
the carbocation IV (although a secondary one) with adjacent positive charges is
relatively less stable than the carbocation III (a primary carbocation) in which
the charges are separated by a saturated carbon atom. Thus, the proton becomes
attached to the carbon adjacent to nitrogen to give the relatively stable
carbocation III. Subsequent reaction of III with I- gives the
anti-Markownikoff product, ICH2CH2 N(CH3)3+I-.
0 Comments